Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Retrospective study of fracture survival in endodontically treated molars: the effect of single-unit crowns versus direct-resin composite restorations

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2021³â 46±Ç 2È£ p.29 ~ 29
Chotvorrarak Kanet, Suksaphar Warattama, Banomyong Danuchit,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Chotvorrarak Kanet ) - Mahidol University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics
 ( Suksaphar Warattama ) - Rangsit University College of Dental Medicine Department of Endodontics
 ( Banomyong Danuchit ) - Mahidol University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics

Abstract


Objectives: This study was conducted to compare the post-fracture survival rate of endodontically treated molar endodontically treated teeth (molar ETT) restored with resin composites or crowns and to identify potential risk factors, using a retrospective cohort design.

Materials and Methods: Dental records of molar ETT with crowns or composite restorations (recall period, 2015?2019) were collected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The incidence of unrestorable fractures was identified, and molar ETT were classified according to survival. Information on potential risk factors was collected. Survival rates and potential risk factors were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier log-rank test and Cox regression model.

Results: The overall survival rate of molar ETT was 87% (mean recall period, 31.73 ¡¾ 17.56 months). The survival rates of molar ETT restored with composites and crowns were 81.6% and 92.7%, reflecting a significant difference (p < 0.05). However, ETT restored with composites showed a 100% survival rate if only 1 surface was lost, which was comparable to the survival rate of ETT with crowns. The survival rates of ETT with composites and crowns were significantly different (97.6% vs. 83.7%) in the short-term (12?24 months), but not in the long-term (> 24 months) (87.8% vs. 79.5%).

Conclusions: The survival rate from fracture was higher for molar ETT restored with crowns was higher than for ETT restored with composites, especially in the first 2 years after restoration. Molar ETT with limited tooth structure loss only on the occlusal surface could be successfully restored with composite restorations.

Å°¿öµå

Crowns; Endodontically treated teeth; Resin composite; Survival rate; Tooth fractures

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed